Yael Galin Loncich

Specialist Instructor in Rehabilitation Neuropsychology, Specialist in Educational Psychology, and
Clinical Psychology Intern

Journal of Clinical Psychology / Early View

RESEARCH ARTICLE

One Simple Question Predicts Well-Being in Radiation Therapy: The Role of Desire for Psychological Intervention and Perceived Social Support

Roni Laslo-Roth, Sivan George-Levi, Yael Galin Loncich, Myriam Sultan, Nirit Wiskop-Farkash, Eli Sapir

First published: 04 June 2025 | https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23814

ABSTRACT

Radiation therapy (RT) is a critical part of cancer treatment often accompanied by heightened anxiety, depression, and reduced life satisfaction. Although psycho-oncological (PO) interventions and social support can alleviate distress, it is unclear whether patients' desire for PO intervention reflects temporary or ongoing distress and whether all patients benefit from social support or only those seeking help. In this study we examined whether the desire for PO intervention during the start of RT predicted anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction at the start and end of RT and whether perceived social support moderated these effects. One-hundred-and-forty-six patients completed questionnaires at three time-points (pre-treatment, first treatment, and last treatment). Results showed that patients desiring PO intervention reported higher anxiety and depression at the start and end of RT. Higher perceived social support predicted lower depression and improved life satisfaction but only for patients expressing a desire for PO intervention. Screening for psychological distress is standard in oncology but often limited by time and resources during RT. The current study findings suggest that a single, straightforward question at the start of RT could identify at-risk patients, enabling proactive intervention. Moreover, fostering perceptions of social support may help mitigate negative outcomes in the absence of professional intervention.

Learn more →


BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Psychol., 04 June 2025
Sec. Health Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1594885

Beyond meaning: hope and secondary trauma in Israeli therapists after the October 7th massacre

Sivan George-Levi, Lir Faverman, Yael Galin Loncich, Anat Ben-Gal Dahan, Rivi Frei-Landau

The massacre on October 7th, 2023 in southern Israel had a profound impact on mental health therapists in the region. Such collective trauma can lead to heightened stress and secondary trauma among therapists. Identifying resilience and risk factors is, therefore, essential for mitigating these effects. This preliminary study involved 60 therapists (75% women; M = 48.3 years, SD = 10.7) from the Sderot Resilience Center, located near the Gaza border, who completed questionnaires about demographic, professional, and war-related factors, as well as secondary trauma symptoms, finding meaning in work, sense of hope, and stress levels during the war, 1 year after the attack. Loss of a loved one during the war was associated with higher stress levels. Secondary trauma symptoms were linked with increased stress, and higher levels of hope were associated with reduced stress. Moderation models indicated that finding meaning in work was associated with lower stress only when secondary trauma symptoms were low or moderate, but not when they were high. Higher hope levels were linked to reduced stress regardless of secondary trauma severity. Although preliminary and cross-sectional, these findings suggest that whereas finding meaning in work may motivate therapists, it may not fully protect them against stress during extreme trauma. Hope, however, appears to offer a stronger protective buffer. Interventions to mitigate risk factors, reduce secondary trauma, and foster hopeful thinking are essential.

Learn more →